<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When Will It Ship? Estimates and Promises</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kylecordes.com/2010/estimates-and-promises/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kylecordes.com/2010/estimates-and-promises</link>
	<description>Software, Business, and Life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 16:22:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle Cordes</title>
		<link>http://kylecordes.com/2010/estimates-and-promises/comment-page-1#comment-76765</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Cordes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 11:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kylecordes.com/?p=573#comment-76765</guid>
		<description>Michel - The non-literal use of &quot;literally&quot; might be a USA-only phenomenon. Here are a couple of web pages about it:

http://www.slate.com/id/2129105

http://literally.barelyfitz.com/about-this-site/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michel &#8211; The non-literal use of &#8220;literally&#8221; might be a USA-only phenomenon. Here are a couple of web pages about it:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2129105" rel="nofollow">http://www.slate.com/id/2129105</a></p>
<p><a href="http://literally.barelyfitz.com/about-this-site/" rel="nofollow">http://literally.barelyfitz.com/about-this-site/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michel Albert</title>
		<link>http://kylecordes.com/2010/estimates-and-promises/comment-page-1#comment-76761</link>
		<dc:creator>Michel Albert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 08:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kylecordes.com/?p=573#comment-76761</guid>
		<description>I do not quite agree with your statement &quot;[...] much like the word “literally” has come to mean its antonym, “figuratively”, which renders it mostly useless.&quot;

I haven&#039;t read (or heard) such a case in which I saw the word &quot;literaly&quot; being used incorrectly. I don&#039;t say that what you are writing is wrong, but it may be a regional phenomenon. Not a global fact ;)

Apart from that, I fully agree with your post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not quite agree with your statement &#8220;[...] much like the word “literally” has come to mean its antonym, “figuratively”, which renders it mostly useless.&#8221;</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t read (or heard) such a case in which I saw the word &#8220;literaly&#8221; being used incorrectly. I don&#8217;t say that what you are writing is wrong, but it may be a regional phenomenon. Not a global fact <img src='http://kylecordes.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Apart from that, I fully agree with your post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

